| |
You all know that sinking feeling. You are cruising
down that favorite back road, not really going fast, just
driving your normal brisk pace (of course, for some of
you, there's no real difference), or you might be headed
home on the freeway in that rare open patch in the
traffic, going about 65 like everyone else, when suddenly
you see that nasty tailgater with the funny hat and the
flashing lights in his grille. Damn! Busted again! You'd
been meaning to buy a detector, but with all the talk
about X-band, K-band, instant-on, and now LASERS for
God's sake, you just never made a decision and now it's
too late and you gotta FEED THE BEARS!
Well, in our never-ending battle for truth, justice
and nirvana on the road, we're here to help you through
the maze. But be forewarned - there are no guarantees.
And there is no substitute for common sense. So herewith
is a quick tour through the microwave jungle.
X-band and K-band - our old friends that have
been around forever. All detectors pick these up, some
better than others. Better than 99% of all police radar
units use one or the other of these frequencies.
Unfortunately, these same frequencies are used by
microwave ovens, burglar alarms, grocery store door
openers and microwave communications towers, so your
detector will probably get a lot of these, too. Once you
get used to them on your daily routes, you will be able
to tell the difference.
Ka-band - a very wide band of the microwave
spectrum. A narrow portion of it is used by Photo Radar
(see below). Very few detectors will pick this up. There
is a brand of radar unit on the market called the Stalker
that uses other frequencies within the Ka band but there
are very few of these units currently in use.
Moving-mode vs. Stationary - refers to the
police car. Stationary-mode radar can only be used from a
motionless police car, like at a trap. With moving-mode
radar, the police car can be moving. The radar takes a
reading off the ground to figure the speed of the police
car, then takes a reading off the target and adds it to
the ground reference to calculate the target's actual
speed. The Staters use this a lot to come up from behind
you. If you get a weak signal that slowly gets stronger,
check your mirrors. Look way back. You should be doing
this anyway - not all cops use radar.
Instant-On - also known as triggered radar.
This is the gun-type where the officer points it at your
car, pulls the trigger and ZAP - he's got your speed. The
police claim there is no defense. Don't believe it. In
the real world, you will start getting a signal on your
detector as the guy at the speed trap zaps the drivers
ahead of you. First you will get a weak signal for a
couple of seconds, then it goes away. Then you will get a
stronger signal for a couple of seconds, which also goes
away. Time to back it down and start looking for likely
trap locations.
I think instant-on is stationary-mode only, but I
won't swear to it. I've never seen it used from a moving
vehicle.
This type is used from both cars and motorcycles. I
have noticed that these units leak a heck of a lot of
microwave radiation even when they are not being
triggered. My Escort routinely picks up State Patrol
motorcycle cops cruising down the road with the gun in
the holster! These guys will eventually be sorry.
Long-term exposure to microwave radiation is known to
cause cancer, and I sure as hell wouldn't want one of
those guns sitting near my crotch 8 hours a day!
Photo Radar - this one has gotten lots of
publicity, but so far it is highly overrated. An unmanned
unit sits by the side of the road. When a car comes by
that is over the preset speed, the unit takes a picture
of the front of the car showing the license plate with
the speed, date and time superimposed, and the police
mail a ticket to the registered owner. It uses a narrow
segment of the total Ka-band. Several detectors now pick
up Ka-band.
Heard a cute story about photo radar. Seems someone
got caught in San Francisco by photo radar. The cops
mailed him the picture of his car and a ticket for $40.
He mailed them back a photo of a pair of twenties! They
responded with a photo of a pair of handcuffs! He paid
the ticket. Who says they don't have a sense of humor.
There is bad news and good news with photo radar. The
bad news is that it can crank out 1200 tickets per hour!
Multiply that by the cost of one ticket, calculate in the
fact that they don't have to pay an officer to sit there,
and this thing looks very attractive to the
revenue-enhancement people. If you don't believe they
think that way, consider the fact that the company that
manufactures the unit gets a set fee for every ticket
issued! It's also bad in that they can hide it in just
about any kind of vehicle, or maybe not in a vehicle at
all.
The good news is that it raises some sticky legal
issues in this state. Washington law requires an officer
to actually stop the offending driver and issue the
citation in person. There is also a Constitutional
question about charging a person with a crime when there
isn't any evidence. After all, they don't try to identify
the driver, they just charge the registered owner. But
laws can be changed.
The real good news is that, when the King County
government tested it a couple of years ago, they found
that rain obscured the image badly enough that they
couldn't read the license plates! So far it is only being
used in a few places in the country, notably Pasadena,
California and Paradise Valley, Colorado. It has been
tried and rejected in a bunch of other places.
Lasers - called lidar in this application. This
is the latest stealth technology and, boy, are the cops
excited! As the name implies, it uses a laser instead of
microwaves and the beam is much tighter, reducing the
risk (or opportunity) of getting a reading off an
unintended target. But all is not honey for the bears.
Car and Driver magazine managed to get their hands on one
of these units and printed a test of it in the April
issue. First, it is stationary-mode only. Second, the
unit is quite heavy (4.4 pounds) and has to be
hand-aimed, which reduces the effectiveness. Car and
Driver found that the difficulty of keeping it aimed at a
single vehicle could increase the time required to lock
in a reading to 3 or 4 seconds. Third, it costs about
three times what a radar unit does. Fourth, it hasn't
established a legal background yet, so it may not be
admissible as evidence in court. And finally, Cincinnati
Microwave already has a laser detector on the market for
$99!
So where does that leave the poor gear-head who wants
to enjoy a good stretch of road or maybe just get to work
on time? Well, if you wanna play, you gotta pay. When the
magazines do a test of detectors, read it and make a
choice. But remember, a detector is just a pair of
binoculars for microwaves. You still need to pay
attention. Do both, show a little discretion in when and
where you hammer it, and you may achieve a peaceful (if
uneasy) coexistence with our furry friends. Let somebody
else feed the bears.
|